Stainless Steel CNC Machining Material Selection Guide Corrosion Resistance and Cost Comparison of 304 vs 316

In the field of precision manufacturing, the success or failure of stainless steel CNC machining often begins with the choice of material. 304 and 316 as a typical representative of austenitic stainless steel, the performance difference directly affects the part's corrosion resistance, machining costs and final application scenarios. This article will be from the chemical composition, corrosion resistance, processing costs of the three major dimensions of in-depth comparison, and gives the CNC machining material selection strategy to help you make accurate decisions.

I. Core differences: from the chemical composition to performance

1. Chemical composition and corrosion resistance

304 stainless steel: containing 18% chromium (Cr) and 8% nickel (Ni), the formation of the basic chromium oxide protective film, resistance to atmospheric, weak acid and food-grade environmental corrosion, but prone to pitting corrosion in the chlorine-containing ion (Cl-) environment (such as seawater or salt spray environment).

316 stainless steel: 2%-3% molybdenum (Mo) is added to 304, and the nickel content is increased to 10%-14%. Molybdenum forms a stable complex with chloride ions, which significantly improves pitting resistance. For example, in 3.5% sodium chloride solution, 316 corrosion rate of only 0.001mm/year, much lower than the 304 0.01mm/year.

2. Mechanical Properties Comparison

High temperature strength: 316 still maintains a yield strength of 150MPa at 800°C, 20% higher than 304, which is suitable for high temperature scenarios such as aero-engine components.

Work hardening rate: 316 work hardening rate is 15% higher than 304, cold machining requires more precise control of cutting parameters, otherwise it is easy to lead to increased tool wear.

II.Cost analysis: economic trade-offs between materials and processing

1. Material cost differences

In unit price comparison: 316 because of the molybdenum element (global reserves of chromium is only 1/50), the price is 30% -50% higher than 304.

Processing cost optimisation:

304 stainless steel: cutting speed up to 120-150m/min, longer tool life, suitable for mass production.

316 stainless steel: need to use carbide cutting tools, line speed needs to be reduced to 80-120m/min, and the coolant flow needs to be increased by 20%, man-hour cost increases by about 15%.

2. Total Life Cycle Cost (TCO)

Case: a desalination equipment manufacturers choose 316 stainless steel processing pump body, although the initial cost increase of 40%, but because of the life extension to 15 years (304 only 5 years), maintenance costs reduced by 60%.

III. Material selection strategy: 3 scenarios decision-making model

1. Conventional environment (weak corrosion, room temperature)

recommended materials: 304 stainless steel (such as kitchenware, appliance shell).

Advantage: low cost, easy to process, surface roughness up to Ra0.8μm, to meet daily needs.

2. High chloride environment (marine, chemical)

Required material: 316 stainless steel (such as ship parts, chemical pipelines).

Technical Points: It is recommended to cooperate with electrolytic polishing to optimise the surface roughness to Ra0.4μm and enhance the corrosion resistance by 30%.

3. Medical and food grade applications

Implantable devices: 316L (low carbon version), meets ASTM F138 standard, better biocompatibility.

Food equipment: 304 meets sanitary standards, but 316 is better suited for acidic or high-salt food processing scenarios (e.g., juice filling equipment).

IV.CNC machining process optimisation recommendations

1. Tool and parameter matching

304 processing: priority use of TiAlN coated carbide tools, cutting speed of 150m/min, feed 0.15mm/tooth.

316 machining: it is recommended to use diamond coated tools, cutting speed down to 100m/min to avoid work hardening.

2. Cooling and surface treatment

Coolant selection: 316 machining requires high permeability coolant (e.g. with extreme pressure additives), flow rate increased by 20% to inhibit thermal deformation.

Post-treatment process: sandblasting (Ra1.6μm) or electrolytic polishing (Ra0.4μm), can enhance corrosion resistance and extend the life of parts.

Consult JLCCNC today for exclusive stainless steel machining solutions!